EFFECTS OF REINTEGRATION APPROACHES ON REINTEGRATION OUTCOMES AMONG CHILDREN TRANSITIONING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CARE TO COMMUNITY LIFE: EVIDENCE FROM MERU CHILDREN'S HOME, MERU COUNTY, KENYA

Authors

  • Mary Kagendo Njeru Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Lawrence Njoroge Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Abstract

Reintegration of children from Charitable Children’s Institutions (CCIs) into family and community settings remains a critical child protection concern in Kenya. Although the National Care Reform Strategy (2022–2032) promotes family-based care as the preferred alternative to institutionalization, evidence on factors associated with successful reintegration remains limited. This study examined the influence of institutional support, legal and policy frameworks, and post-reintegration services on reintegration outcomes among children reintegrated from Meru Children’s Home in Meru County, Kenya. The study adopted a mixed-methods case study design and collected data from 96 respondents using structured questionnaires and interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings showed that most reintegrated children lived with their parents and remained enrolled in school or vocational training, indicating positive social and educational adjustment. Institutional support, legal and policy frameworks, and post-reintegration services each contributed to successful reintegration outcomes. Children who received adequate preparation before reintegration, including counseling, emotional support, participation in decision-making, and family involvement, adjusted better to family and community life. Effective child protection systems, monitoring mechanisms, and awareness of children's rights also enhanced reintegration experiences. Continued psychosocial support, educational assistance, follow-up services, and provision of basic needs after reintegration further promoted children's well-being, resilience, and social integration. Institutional support emerged as the most influential predictor of successful reintegration. The study concludes that reintegration is not a one-time placement event but a continuous process that requires coordinated support before, during, and after a child leaves institutional care. The study recommends strengthening pre-reintegration preparation, enhancing the implementation and monitoring of child protection policies, and expanding post-reintegration support services to improve the long-term well-being and successful adjustment of reintegrated children.

Keywords: Child reintegration; family-based care; Charitable Children's Institutions (CCIs); institutional support; post-reintegration services; child protection policy; Meru County; Kenya.

Author Biographies

  • Mary Kagendo Njeru, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

    Department of Development Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Lawrence Njoroge, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

    Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

References

Abu, W. O., Onsarigo, T. G., Adeli, S. N., Ochieng, F., Musyoka, M., & Ogutu, J. (2024). Challenges facing children reintegration in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5(4), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2024v05i04.0390

Better Care Network. (2021). The impact of institutional care on children’s mental health and social outcomes. Better Care Network.

Better Care Network. (2022). Post-reintegration challenges for institutionalized children: A global perspective. Better Care Network.

Better Care Network. (2023). Sustainable reintegration models for children leaving institutional care. Better Care Network.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Delap, E. (2020). Family strengthening and preventing unnecessary separation of children from families. Family for Every Child.

Government of Kenya. (2022). National Care Reform Strategy for Children in Kenya (2022–2032). Nairobi: Government Printer.

Grover, N., Rastogi, K., & Chakraborty, S. (2026). Psychosocial adjustment of institutionalised children: A thematic analysis of caregiver perspectives in Delhi. Annals of Neurosciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531261435741

Kalra, G. K., & Modi, K. (2025). Using the ‘Circle of Care’ to strengthen families for their reintegration after transition away from institutional care. ASEAN Social Work Journal. https://doi.org/10.58671/aswj.v13i1.59

National Council for Children Services (NCCS). (2022). Kenya’s National Care Reform Strategy (2022–2032). Nairobi, Kenya.

National Council for Children Services (NCCS). (2023). Progress on the deinstitutionalization of children in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya.

Neville, S. E., Wakia, J., Hembling, J., Bradford, B., Kiandiko, M., Ochieng, M., Apiyo, E., Karama, K., Kituku, A., Obuya, M., Oindo, M., Ochuka, W., Saran, I., Lombe, M., & Crea, T. M. (2025). Subjective well-being of Kenyan children reunified with families from residential care institutions: A closer look at child disability. Child Protection and Practice, 6, 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100212

Petrowski, N., Cappa, C., & Gross, P. (2017). Estimating the number of children in formal alternative care: Challenges and results. Child Abuse & Neglect, 70, 388–398.

Phillimore, J., Bradby, H., Knecht, M., Padilla, B., & Pemberton, S. (2022). Health, wellbeing, and social integration: The impact of prolonged institutionalization on children. Journal of Child Welfare Research, 29(3), 78–95.

Save the Children. (2021). Improving reintegration outcomes: The role of early intervention and mentorship programs. Save the Children.

Tree of Life Agency. (2023). Post-reintegration monitoring: Evaluating the success of reintegration at Meru Children’s Home. Nairobi, Kenya.

UNICEF. (2021). Guidelines for reintegration of children from institutional care into family and community-based care. United Nations Children’s Fund.

UNICEF. (2022). Guidelines on the reintegration of children from institutional care. United Nations Children’s Fund.

UNICEF. (2023). Long-term outcomes for reintegrated children in Kenya. United Nations Children’s Fund.

United Nations. (2010). Guidelines for the alternative care of children. United Nations.

Wilke, N. G., Howard, A. H., & Goldman, P. (2020). Rapid return of children in residential care to family as a result of COVID-19: Scope, challenges, and recommendations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 110(Pt 2), 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104712

Zewude, B., Tadele, G., Engdawork, K., & Assefa, S. (2023). A social-ecological view of the factors affecting the effectiveness of reintegration interventions targeting children out of family-based care situations: A scoping review. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2277343

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

EFFECTS OF REINTEGRATION APPROACHES ON REINTEGRATION OUTCOMES AMONG CHILDREN TRANSITIONING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CARE TO COMMUNITY LIFE: EVIDENCE FROM MERU CHILDREN’S HOME, MERU COUNTY, KENYA. (2026). African Journal of Emerging Issues, 8(19), 91-106. https://ajoeijournal.org/sys/index.php/ajoei/article/view/1220