TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF HOUSING CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES IN KENYA, KASARANI SUB-COUNTY, NAIROBI COUNTY
Abstract
Purpose of Study: The study examined the relationship between technological advancement and organizational performance of housing construction companies in Kasarani Sub-County, Nairobi County, Kenya.
Statement of the Problem: Technological advancement has become increasingly important in the construction industry because effective project delivery depends on timely information, accurate planning, coordinated site activities, and rapid managerial decision-making. Despite these benefits, adoption of technology among residential construction companies in Kenya remains uneven, particularly among small and medium-sized firms that face challenges related to cost, technical skills, implementation capacity, and integration of technology into routine project activities. This situation may limit the ability of construction firms to improve project efficiency and overall organizational performance.
Research Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive-correlational survey design within the broader dissertation study. The target population comprised 285 housing construction companies, from which 166 firms were selected using simple random sampling. A total of 148 usable questionnaires were returned, representing an 89.16% response rate. Data was collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: Pearson correlation analysis established a strong, positive, and statistically significant relationship between technological advancement and organizational performance (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Regression analysis further showed that technological advancement was a positive and statistically significant predictor of organizational performance (β = 0.33, t = 5.42, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Technological advancement significantly influenced organizational performance among housing construction companies. The benefits of technology are greater when digital systems and tools are effectively integrated into routine project-management processes rather than being treated as stand-alone investments.
Recommendation: Housing construction companies should adopt a phased and strategic approach to technological investment, focusing on systems that are suitable for their operational needs and financial capacity.
Keywords: Technological advancement, Technology adoption, Organizational performance, housing construction, Digital construction, Project management
References
Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127.
Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2019). 2019 Kenya population and housing census: Volume II—Distribution of population by administrative units. KNBS.
Marube, O. B. J., & Ombui, K. (2021). Influence of strategic management best practices on performance of commercial building projects registered by National Construction Authority in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 6(3), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.694
Maruti, P. B., Fundi, I., & Obiero, B. (2024). Impact of selected digital technologies on performance of construction projects in Kenya: Case study of Nairobi City County. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 13(3).
Nasila, M., & Cloete, C. (2018). Adoption of Building Information Modelling in the construction industry in Kenya. Acta Structilia, 25(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/as25i2.1
Ngiri, G. M., & Njagi, E. (2022). Strategic innovation and communication on the performance of building construction companies in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Applied Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.35942/jahss.v1i2.4
Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006
Rui, Y., Lim, Y.-W., & Tan, C. S. (2021). Construction project management based on Building Information Modeling (BIM). Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(6), 2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090633
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Succar, B. (2009). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
